- #18 200mm lens for canon 7d review full
- #18 200mm lens for canon 7d review iso
- #18 200mm lens for canon 7d review plus
- #18 200mm lens for canon 7d review series
Overall, I would opt for 15-85 and expect high failure rate at the school plays. Street events: lighting decent so 15-85 (at the long end not much slower than the 24-105 f4).
#18 200mm lens for canon 7d review plus
But at a push 24-105.īirthday parties - wide angle for indoor shots and short telephoto plus wide aperture for low light: 15-55 (or the Tamron) School plays - none of the above unless you are really close to the stage. Travel - to get some architectural wide angle and short telophoto for portraits: 17-55 or 15-85 So give us an example of what you would miss most for your listed uses. The 15-85, 17-55 f2.8 (or Tamron 17-50), 24-105 f4, and 24-70 all have diffferent compromises on top end, short end and aperture. The fact you 'love' the 100f2.8 and the 10-22 suggests you have to compromise on either focal length or aperture. You say the 28-105 is a 'weak' walkaround lens. I will concede that I mainly shoot architecture/interiors/landscape, so your mileage may vary.ĭavid - you have whole load of lenses and have still not given us any idea of what you are looking for from your next purchase.
#18 200mm lens for canon 7d review full
Now that I've switched up to full frame, the 17-40 is still on my camera a majority of the time.
I fell in love with a 28-135IS on my 30D quite a while ago, but still found myself coming back to the 17-40.
#18 200mm lens for canon 7d review series
Not to mention the fact that an L series lens will hold it's value much better, (especially if you buy it used) but is also tack sharp, weather sealed, and just generally a step up. This lens was an excellent pair with the nifty 50, and between the two I learned quite a bit. Of course there were plenty of times I wished i had something longer, or a larger aperture for portraits, but that's just part of life. I'd say this one lens contributed to the most to making me a better photographer, instead of just sitting on the side zooming away. Even though 64mm (crop body) might seem too short, I found that it pushed me to get closer into the action, and really evaluate each shot. It was my first L lens, and honestly my first serious piece of glass.
#18 200mm lens for canon 7d review iso
It might seem a little too slow for an all purpose lens, but with the outstanding high iso performance these days, its more than manageable. I hope this helps, especially the questions about the 28-105 insufficiency.Īnother vote for the 17-40 f4. But, if you love your 100 macro and 10-22 I doubt you'd be satisfied with the IQ. Of course, there are the 18-200/250/270 super zooms. Overall, I'd think the 15-85 would be the strongest candidate, unless you need low light capabilities. So, I sometimes use my 85 1.8 if its later in the day. Even the f/5.6 on the long end works in the day time, but starts to be a stretch as the sun goes down. If you're thinking about buildings you will probably use wider focal lengths, but details on buildings may require more zoom.įor street events, I use my EF-S 55-250. However, those don't really meet your needs in other aspects of "walk around". Will 50/55mm be sufficient from your seats? For stage performances I've considered the Tamron 28-75 and the Sigma 50-150 - both in f/2.8. But, that begs the question of how close you can get to the stage.
School plays may need fast glass, so the f/2.8's become attractive. You describe travel, school plays and street events as possible uses for the "walk around" lens. So, the Tamron 17-50 or the Canon 15-85 or 17-55 would probably be the best additions to your kit. The kit you describe seems to have the weak link in the 15/17/18-XX zoom range.
If you can nail the reason(s) you find the 28-105 to be a weak walk around you can probably answer the question of the 24-105 without even having to rent one to try it out.
In what ways do you find the 28-105 to be a weak walk around lens for your 7D? Is 28 not wide enough? If so, would 24 be wide enough? Is it not fast enough? On the wide end it is faster than the 24-105, but slower on the long end. However, your comment beside your 28-105 is that you find it to be "weak walk around".
0 kommentar(er)
